Fri 29 Feb 2008
Apparently, Oregon spends the largest percentage of its budget on prisons of any state. LINK
Before we get into the inevitable attacks on Measure 11, we might want to look at a few factors. First,
You would expect Kevin Mannix to defend incarceration, but perhaps not in this way. He said that the reason we pay so much is because we have well-compensated corrections officers. He admitted that this is a good thing, saying, “You get what you pay for,” and stating that the high compensation was one of the reasons we don’t have as many problems with drugs in our prisons as other states.
There are some changes on the horizon. Mannix’s mandatory minimums measure would mandate a huge increase in prison spending. If it passes, it seems like we would have to take a look at what “prison” means, moving away from politically popular, but ineffective, large, secure, and expensive prisons in Eastern Oregon for a cheaper, more effective, community-based minimum security model.
If, instead, SB 1087 passes, that would actually fund treatment programs. The hope is that this would boost
So, if the bad news is that we spend a lot on prisons, perhaps it’s not that we have too many people in prison, but rather that we spend a lot on prisons. It’s heartening to see that there’s some consensus that we shouldn’t be cutting corrections officer salaries to make it cheaper, although maybe we should be looking at the system to figure out how to make it less expensive and more effective. However, you needn’t look farther that the current debate over community supervision for the mentally ill to see how popular these sorts of community placements are. Everyone agrees that they’re a good idea, but no one wants one in their town.
WordPress database error: [Table 'wp_comments' is marked as crashed and should be repaired]
SELECT * FROM wp_comments WHERE comment_post_ID = '180' AND comment_approved = '1' ORDER BY comment_date