Thu 23 Aug 2007
We visited Iran some decades ago. We being US.
There are some who would like to sell the American people that we should visit again:
Thu 23 Aug 2007
We visited Iran some decades ago. We being US.
There are some who would like to sell the American people that we should visit again:
August 23rd, 2007 at 1:25 pm
Here we are once again considering the terrorist nation of Iran. A nation that controls Palestine through Hamas, Lebanon and Syria though Hezbollah, and Iraq through the Mahdi army, untold numbers of insurgency and militant organizations and even Al Qaeda. Iran is closing in quickly on the ability to mass produce nuclear weapons while our politicians are arguing over whether or not they are even a threat to the region, and our own nation. Israel, as I have said before, does not have the luxury of debating this issue until the day it is confirmed that the Iranian nuclear program has in fact produced it’s first reliable weapon. Israel has nuclear weapons but will they use them? It is a strongly held belief that only the United States can deliver a conventional strike devastating enough to impact the Iranian nuclear program, however, if the United States does not do that and soon, Israel will be forced to consider the nuclear option as it’s only reliable means of ensuring it’s continued existence.
When considering the possible destruction of your entire population by nuclear assault, the nuclear option does not seem so terrible in light of the consequence of waiting too long, or conducting an inadequate conventional strike. European nations, Russia and China have prevented measures that could have reigned in Iran many times before. Creating a situation whereby the one entity that could have made a difference (United Nations), is instead provoking the inevitable destruction of either Israel or Iran or possibly even the destruction of both nations.
Iran has created a reality on the ground throughout the Middle East that provides the ultimate fallback. Iran’s arming, training and positioning of Hezbollah, Hamas, the Mahdi Army, and literally hundreds of other militant assets means that at a moments notice Iran could create complete chaos throughout the entire region. Imagine all of these groups being coordinated by Iran’s military machine causing the cessation of trade throughout the region, the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians in countries throughout the Middle East, and the successful overthrow of governments unable to respond quickly enough to such an unconventional enemy.
If the United States is unable or unwilling to confront Iran militarily within the next 12 months, world war three is almost a certainty. Because if Iran is able to get all their pieces in place before they are directly attacked, this chess game is over and no country in the world will be safe from the terrorist army they have been building up arming and training for over 30 years. China, Russia, Venezuela and many other countries have already chosen their allies in this struggle by supporting, supplying and defending Iran in it’s quest for nuclear weapons and undying support of terrorism in all it’s horrific forms and manifestations.
August 23rd, 2007 at 1:49 pm
I think they have already named this theory: the domino theory. When we create a foreign policy based on fear of the sum of the worst-case scenarios, they have already won. Terrorism is about spreading fear and having us react to it instead of us act based on the very principles this country is founded on.
This very reasoning led us to Iraq. Iraq has been an absolute failure, both the sheer idea of it and the strategy. Our war in Iraq has destroyed our efforts to claim any moral superiority and is the call to arms of new terrorists.
There are many reasons to fear Iran, but that doesn’t mean that therefore attacking them is the thing to do. The history of the world is littered with examples where escalation of conflicts with more conflicts ends poorly.