Thu 24 Apr 2008
I won’t lie to you, no county commissioner or candidate will solve the budget crisis on their own, not at this point.
We are $47 million in the hole due to a cut in Federal funding under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act. These funds replace the payments the federal government used to make to counties in exchange for not paying taxes on the land owned by the US Government in counties in Oregon. This “timber money” (because it was mostly forest land used for timber production, recreation, etc.) declined dramatically due to the increasing recognition that trees take a long time to grow and we were cutting them down way too fast.
Commissioner Bill Dwyer made the best statement I’ve heard so far at the April 16th Commissioner’s meeting, where he stated (paraphrased):
We’ve cried wolf 13 times [asking the county voters to pass extra taxes in face of the upcoming cuts in federal payments]. Now the wolf is at the door, and we have to figure out what to do with what we have.
However passionate, nevertheless, the last attempt to raise taxes in Lane County in May 2007 (which failed by a whopping 70%-30% vote) was doomed to fail. In November of 2006, voters narrowly decided not to enact a different tax (51% to 49%). Those opposed to the second tax oh so cleverly called themselves the “We Said No” coalition.
I had to support it (even though it was an incredibly unfair, anti-progressive tax). Guess I’m a fool for the mentally ill, children, victims of crime, disabled, senior, and others who will lose critical support when these cuts become real.
So, how in the heck do we persuade Lane County voters to tax themselves more? And I absolutely think we have to do so if we are going to have a humane and safe existence in Lane County.
Young people of Lane County, I think we have to speak with one voice:
Yes, we want our little brothers and sisters to have full bellies with the help of WIC.
Yes, we want our teens to get the help they need when delinquency becomes a danger to themselves and others.
Yes, we want our animals cared for rather than slaughtered when they are lost, or abandoned.
Yes, we think people with mental health and addiction needs should get the help they need to live productive healthy lives.
Yes, we want our jails to hold the abusers accountable with effective diversion and corrections when necessary.
Yes, we’d really like to know when that hot hot hot love muffin we met last week turns up with chlamydia (because Lane County Public Health calls you if someone who tests positive for an STI names you as a recent sex partner so you can get yerself tested, too).
Not to mention the excellent work Public Health nurses did controlling the last measles outbreak to 2 people.
And that is just the start.
So, what will Lane County voters pay for? Are we really that cruel of a county? After living here all these years with these wonderful people, and I mean that, I’m confused.
April 25th, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Cutting trees way to fast? you may want to check that out. The private wood lot owners and BLM lands are cut under the forest practices act, which requires a sustainable yeald. That means that as the cutting is rotated over the ownerships that by the time that they get back to the plot they have already cut, it has trees the same size as the first cutting. Until houses start to be built again the money from timber harvest will be minimle. The feds shinanigans with our county timber money gos back to around 1937 when the O&C railroad land was taken back into federal ownership and the timber money in lew of tax sheime was enacted by congress. Now the feds want to renigg on their promise and shift the burden of making up that money to the local people. We need to keep the feds honest!
I agree with you every county program you listed is of vital importance as well as are many more that you did not mention desperatly needs to be kept to have a decent plase to live. I too voted in favor of the tax levies. Yes, we need to empower the young as a nation to tell congres to put back what they have taken from us with one united voice. And some wonder why voters have lost faith in our system and congress.
April 26th, 2008 at 9:16 am
Thanks for the deeper history and analysis Delbert. I was taking some serious short cuts with the issue, which is complex and long term.
Another oversimplification that I have found interesting: The payments to counties, when linked to timber harvests, declined dramatically as the federal forest priorities shifted — as reflected by the endangered species act and the impact of forest harvest practices on species like (dare I say it) the spotted owl.
Again, so much more to the issue than this!
April 26th, 2008 at 10:32 am
Lets add one more quirk to the pot. At some point in the past privete timber land owners paid an advelorum tax that basicly was a property tax on the timbers growth each year. At some point, 70’s I believe, that tax was traded for a system where tax was paid on actual harvest at time of harvest. So my point is if all of the O&C land wire still in privete ownership and we were under the advelorum tax structure, there would be tax income every year regardless of harvest level. So when the feds took those lands back and promised to pay in lew of tax to the counties back in 1937 or before, the stage was then set for what we now have today if the federal government decided not to keep their side of the deal. They should be paying an amount each year that equils what the advelorum tax would have yealded to the counies each year were the adveloum tax in efect today.
April 26th, 2008 at 8:39 pm
One minor point - diversions for violent offenders are inappropriate. What’s the point in making a second conviction a felony if you’re not going to convict people? Besides a DV conviction prohibits the offender from possessing a firearm, decreasing the lethality of future assaults.
On the main point, losing the timber money would be the worst thing in the world for Lane County over the short run, but the best thing over the long run. This is not a magical horn of plenty - the well will run dry on the timber money. Lane County voters embody the best and worst of Oregon - they’re politically progressive, but they’re also extremely cheap and NEVER admit that Oregon’s government routinely gets high marks for efficiency in providing essential services at low cost.
I’ll give you a good example. Lane County has the lowest number of police officers per capita in the country and totally inadequate jail space to accommodate even just violent offenders. Yet, the county has always made it work with the timber money.
Here’s a vision for the future - Linn County doesn’t get nearly the timber money that Lane does, so every 4 years, like clockwork, the citizens vote for a law enforcement levy that makes the system work approximately like it should. And remember, this is in a county with lower education levels, lower per capita income, and that votes reliably Republican.
When the timber money goes away, Lane County voters are in for some terrible things. Because jail space will be reduced from its current 50% adequacy to about 15% adequacy, extremely violent offenders will be released pretrial. People will be murdered. Witnesses will be intimidated. Crime will rise. That nice new car you bought? Kiss it goodbye - even if they catch the guy, he’ll never serve time and your car will be long gone. Your house - don’t bother with locks - with no place to put burglars, there’s no incentive not to do a little B&E. Eventually people will get some sense and vote for a levy - the only reasonable long-term solution to the problem. But, as is abundantly evident, there’s neither the political willpower to do a reasonable tax at the County Commission level nor the common sense to actually pass such a levy right now.
July 14th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
http://nadiasindi.proboards85.com/index.cgi?board=issues&action=display&thread=10
WOPR
«Ralph,
It hit me your word about Rob Handy’s comments you said tonight. That he spoke against the “WOPR” at the city club.!! and I mentioned that he never, ever mentioned a word about it at any of our 11 Forums, since the City club.
I think he’s been bought by them?!! some one is giving him money from the timber people! nadia>>
“As far as the WOPR timber sale proposal, if Handy has indeed dropped it as an issue, I would very much like to see you pick it up. Cutting down the last old public forests is not the answer to funding a county police state.” ralph
Contributions pick up the pace for candidates:
http://www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sit….875&sid=4&fid=1
Contributions pick up the pace for candidates: The Register-Guard …
News, sports, classified, weather, University of Oregon Ducks. … Recent donors to Handy include Eugene Firefighters PAC ($500); KIVA’s Brown ($250); …
www.registerguard.com/csp/cms/sites/dt.cms.support.viewStory.cls?cid=101875&sid=4&fid=1
–
Salaam. nadia
We will forget and forgive any judgment error that you make, but integrity
mistakes are forever.
– David Cottrell
I’m running as a write in for Lane County Commissioner: Please, I need your
financial support, endorsement, VOTES.
www.nadiasindi.com
I am the Oregon Representative for:
www.StudentLoanJustice.Org