The vivisection of what makes news into a CNN headline.

Take a tragedy: Five people die in a car accident. And slowly massage the words. Five people die in a BMW accident. Five people die in a BMW accident off an elevated airstrip. Five Killed When BMW has Accident Off Elevated Airstrip. “5 Killed When BMW Flies Off Elevated Airstrip, Hits Top Of Tree”. That’s where the local news station took it. I can still basically understand that a tragedy took place when a car drove off an elevated airstrip.

To fit the CNN profile, we need to go further: 5 Die when BMW flies off elevated airstrip. And finally “Five die when BMW flies off runway.” How creative. CNN chooses the funny little pun about “flying off” and “runway.” Cute little word trick to capture a little more attention to a story where five people died. Trivialize the accident and get a few more readers curious if this was a flying BMW and how it would fly off a runway. The local affiliate uses a similar play on words but at least calls it an elevated airstrip so the crash makes a bit more sense in context.

And this is how we are informed from one of the main sources of news in our country. They take their solemn duty of educating our voting populous lightly. There are many less sensational stories that we need to learn more about, and that we can do something about. For example, hospital-acquired infections kill nearly 100,000 people annually in the US. On average that’s 273 dying each day — or 55 BMW accidents daily. CNN making this a priority could literally save thousands of lives a year just by cutting that number by 2%. If they replaced all Spears/Ledger stories with this, that wouldn’t be difficult; they could give it a Fox slant like “The War on Dirty Hands”.

CNN. We are listening. Choose your news wisely.